Dalai Lama on Secular Ethics
In a recent interview "Ocean of wit and wisdoms", the Dalai Lama re-iterated his position about secular ethics, which are human values and positive emotions such as loving kindness and compassion, which "have got nothing to do with religious faith. I usually call these 'secular ethics.' Irrespective of whether you accept religion or not, this is according to our common sense, our common experience, and also scientific findings."
In an earlier interview, he said much the same thing:
"I call these secular ethics, secular beliefs. There’s no relationship with any particular religion. Even without religion, even as nonbelievers, we have the capacity to promote these things.......
No, these are not necessarily Buddhist teachings. These are old teachings based on human values. The way of presentation is different according to each religion."
Secular ethics are universal and independent from religions. They are probably related to the biological and social conditions of humans.
A New York Times article Is ‘Do Unto Others’ Written Into Our Genes?
discusses Jonathan Haidt book “The Happiness Hypothesis,” which is about the evolutionary view of morality.
Similarly, research on game-theoretic emergence of fairness and altruism, see e.g. "Games People Play and How Nice Guys Finish First" seems to support a non-religious foundation of morality.
Finally, research in neuroscience, see e.g. "Mirror Neurons Open New Vistas"
provides a biological basis for compassion and loving kindness through mirror neurons which are sometimes called Dalai Lama neurons.
I don't know if this is why the Dalai Lama is so interested in neuroscience, and in science in general. What is certain is that the scientific evidence of an evolutionary view of morality is growing
Other interesting topics in the interview is his statement, that the Dalai Lama institution need not necessarily be preserved, it could be replaced by a democratic process of election.
At the end, he expressed his views on theistic-religions:
"I'm Buddhist, I'm a Buddhist practitioner. So actually I think that according to nontheistic Buddhist belief, things are due to causes and conditions. No creator. So I have faith in our actions, not prayer. Action is important. Action is karma. Karma means action. That's an ancient Indian thought. In nontheistic religions, including Buddhism, the emphasis is on our actions rather than god or Buddha. So some people say that Buddhism is a kind of atheism. Some scholars say that Buddhism is not a religion — it's a science of the mind."





6 komentar:
I applaud the Dalai Lama's efforts to build bridges between faith groups and the secular world. At times, though, it seems we gloss over important differences in doing so. Respecting each other with our differences carries more weight than trying to be more alike.
actually, the Dalai Lama pointed to some very important differences: distancing from faith and prayer based religions, religious rituals, and theistic religions. Nevertheless, he is very tolerant, even to the "bad guys", and always stressing non-violence.
Nice interview! On the subtopic of neuroscience and the Dalai Lama, I recently read a decent book Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain about meetings between the Dalai Lama & co. and neuroscientists. Have you read it? It makes a bit too much out of the religion vs. science culture wars for my tastes but describes a lot of neuroscience studies of great interest to a meditator.
No, I have not read the book, but from the reviews at Amazon, it definitely is a must-read book. The author SHARON BEGLEY has written about neuroplasticity in the Proceed Nat Acad Sci http://www.urbandharma.org/udharma8/monksmed.html
Humanity is driven by the need for predictability. Morality is a belief system that attempst to classify the present, in order to predict the future. Regardless of faith, morality is the belief in right and wrong. So, follow this logic...
if morality IS Right + Wrong
and if for every one thing that is (R)ight there is an infinite number of (NOT R) things that are (W)rong.
So, morality is 1R + infinite W
(Infinity + 1) is still Infinity, and thus...
Morality is infinitely Wrong.
Said another way...
Morality is the sum of 1R + an infinite number of (NOT R)... and, thus Morality is infinitely NOT R.
My point is Morality is a bankrupt belief system that does not ensure a predictable future... in only ensures unstability.
Ethics - the belief that what you do and say matters... is far more stable. People who believe that they truly matter always serve others... people who don't think they matter, often don't think others matter, or what they do or say matters... for me, I'll take significance over righteous any day.
you said: "for every one thing that is (R)ight there is an infinite number of (NOT R) things that are (W)rong. "
What about for every one thing that is (W)rong there is an infinite number of (NOT W) things that are (R)ight?
But I guess, since you believe in Ethics (right action), it does not matter if your logic is flawed or not.
In Buddhism, right action and right view/understanding are necessary as parts of the 8 Noble Path. You can't take just one of them.
Post a Comment