Google

Blog Archive

Recent Comments

Showing posts with label mind virus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mind virus. Show all posts

12/27/07

LifeHack, GTD, ZTD and Friends

What is LifeHack, GTD, ZTD, and LifeHack 2.0?

LifeHack 1.0 is productivity tips to cut through information overload, and generally to get better organized. It was extracted from highly efficient IT people, similar to Steven Covey's "The 7 Habits of Highly Efficient People" for the general case.

For example the book "LifeHacker: 88 Tech Tricks to Turbocharge Your Day"
includes hacks such as emailing your future self (reminders), installing a personal Wiki, avoiding time wasting sites, automate repetitive tasks, control email, keep the Inbox empty, Google searching, firewalls, backups, etc.

GTD (Getting-Things-Done) is a set of tools (manual or electronic) to externalize our to-do lists, so that we need not keep them in our heads, and thus reduce stress. GTD can be seen as a glorified to-do-list, it includes calendars, workflows, 6 levels of focus and planning.

ZTD (Zen-To-Done) is a book by Leo Babauta: "Zen To Done: The Ultimate Simple Productivity System" , which claims to have combined GTD with Stephen Covey 7 Habits. ZTD focuses on developing 10 habits.

LifeHack 2.0 is a term I coined for the extension of LifeHack 1.0 to non IT subjects such as creativity, happiness, procrastination, writing and presentation skills, negotiation, investing, relaxation, mindfulness, exercise, sleep, eating habits, and giving gifts. These are some of topics you can find at LifeHack.org.

I am trying to compile LifeHack 2.0 hacks, some of these have appeared on this blog already. Hacks should be action oriented, and not domain specific. They can be inspired by philosophies and spiritual traditions, but should be acceptable to people from various beliefs.

LifeHack 2.0 Examples:

  • To see the extra-ordinary in ordinary things
  • Do simple ordinary things such as dish washing, sweeping the floor, gardening
  • Less Multi-tasking, more focus on here and now
  • Mindfulness, using every day events for reminders to be mindful (Thich Nhat Hanh suggested every time when a phone rings, to compose ourselves, before picking up the phone)
  • Mindfulness of bad habits to break them
  • Refactoring and re-purposing, get the task completed first and improve by refactoring (as in extreme programming). Re-use by re-purposing
  • Continuous Learning
  • Sub tasking, take one bite at a time
  • Don't use violence
All of the above hacks still need to be reworked, elaborated, or subdivided into smaller hacks.

I would be grateful for comments and suggestions of such LifeHack 2.0 tips from the readers.

Revised version: Life Hack 2.0 How-to's

1/2/07

My First Encounter with a Rootkit

The year 2006 was the first time I got a rootkit malware in my laptop. Despite two anti-virus software, one spyware protector, and Windows firewall, somehow the rootkit managed to turn off the firewall and infected my computer. The anti-virus and spyware protector didn't report anything unusual, but the computer behavior was getting weird. Installing the Microsoft Windows Defender did not help either. Finally my son Andy suggested it could be a rootkit, and send me to sysinternals.com which has a free product called RootkitRevealer. The company has now been bought by Microsoft, and you can find the software on Microsoft TechNet.

RootkitRevealer succeeded identifying a rootkit malware (a backdoor), and a file infected with it, but to my surprise, I could not find the file infected in order to delete it. The file was well hidden from the operating system.
I didn't want to format the whole disk and re-install everything, which would be the last resort available.

Then I found Haxfix
Haxdoor Removal by searching the net, and it worked wonder for me, a big relief! Caution: it is a potent software, use with care at your own risk.
Finally I run CCleaner to clean up the registry.

Rootkits were originally application tools which can run undetected by the host operating system.
It can hide files, registry entries, network connections, etc. from operating systems such as Linux and Windows. Although a rootkit file is there somewhere, when you try to access it from the operating system, the rootkit can intercept the access request and returns "not found". Malware becomes very sophisticated using the rootkit technology.

Oliver Friedrichs, the director of Symantec's security response team, said: "They just got tougher this year, They're harder to detect and harder to remove. And they're harder for individuals to detect themselves. In the past, users could find a malicious file themselves, an errant key in the registry, or a process running in Windows. Now threats are less likely to show up there and more likely to be hidden on a system."

Even RootkitRevealer is not meant to detect all rootkits. Some malware will now try to detect RootkitRevealer and conceal themselves from RootkitRevealer.

The first malware rootkit created a big scandal, when in 2005 Sony Music installed it on the the user PC without his/her knowledge, as part of the copy protection scheme without mentioning it on the packaging. It was not acceptable, not even if it were from Microsoft or Google.

Finally, as this blog's theme is about mind viruses, I can't help wondering about the techniques mind viruses use to prevent detection from us. Considering that the brain is so much older than computers, mind viruses must have grown very very sophisticated.

In earlier posts, I suggested meditation, mindfulness to detect viruses. Some viruses may not be detectable in this way. Sometimes the infection manifests in our behavior and actions, and other people might notice it, when we ourselves are unaware of it. But often when we are afflicted by a mind virus, by nature of the infection, our friends and relatives also suffer the same, and would not be able to help.
In this case, it might be useful to consult a master instead of relying on ourselves only.

11/1/06

The God Delusion and The Self Delusion in Buddhism

Marx said religion is opium, Dawkins ("The God Delusion (TGD)" )argued that God is a delusion.
The debate on TGD has been very heated, to get some idea, read The Huffington Post for a summary of Dawkins' position and about 580 comments running across 24 pages.

Most discussions are related to Christianity, what about Buddhism?

Buddhism is regarded as Pantheistic, and sometimes agnostic, so the clash with Dawkins is not expected to be as sharp.

First thing to note, however, is that there are many schools of Buddhism, with very different views about God.

Theravada (or doctrine of the Elders) is definitely agnostic, and refuses to go into intellectual arguments about things not here and now. It focuses on the purification of the mind, which if achieved, could provide answers to the difficult questions.
Discussing it now when our minds are full of mind viruses is futile.

It is told that the historical Buddha, an ordinary person, said that he can only point the way, everybody needs to tread their own paths.

This is different from Stephen Jay Gould's 'NOMA' - 'non-overlapping magisteria'.
Gould claimed that science and true religion never come into conflict because they exist in completely separate dimensions of discourse.

Other schools of Buddhism believe in certain Gods and Goddesses, such as bodhisattvas, who have vowed to help all sentient being to be liberated. Such boddhisattvas are worshipped for their superpowers.
These schools would be at loggerheads with Dawkins.

Other schools believe in Buddha-nature, or in Sunyata (Emptiness), which is some kind of Pantheism, similar to what Spinoza and Einstein believed.



"Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected in a cosmic religion
for the future: It transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology;
it covers both the natural and the spiritual, and it is based on a religious
sense aspiring from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual, as a meaningful unity."

Albert Einstein



Is Buddhism a meme?
Going further to Dawkins earlier work "The Selfish Gene", where he introduced the term meme as a unit
of cultural transmission, we may ask if Buddhism is a meme.
Dawkins said that religions or religious practices and rituals are complexes of memes or memplexes.
Some of the Buddhist rituals are definitely memes, but it is interesting to hear Susan Blackmore,
the author of "The Meme Machine" about meditation:


"if a meditational system such as Buddhism is a meme,
then it is actually a very peculiar one - a meme-clearing meme."


Meditation is a tool to be aware of the viruses in our mind, including religions.

The self delusion
Finally, the central tenet of Buddhism is the no self doctrine: no self, no soul, no reincarnation.
It regards the Self Delusion as a much serious problem than the God delusion.
I wonder if Dawkins would regard self as a delusion.

10/29/06

Debugging mind viruses: Clear Comprehension.



"Take the life-lie away from the average man and straight away you take away his happiness." Henrik Ibsen: The Wild Duck

"But yet the light that led astray
Was light from Heaven."
Robert Burns: The Vision


This is a continuation of the posting Debugging Mind Viruses, where Clear Comprehension is mentioned together with Bare Attention, as the two parts of Insight Meditation. Bare Attention and Clear Comprehension are complementary to each other, each supporting the other.

It is said that Bare Attention cannot be sustained for a very long period. In our terminology, Bare Attention is debug mode, and we cannot stay in debug mode all the time, we have to attend to our mundane tasks. Clear Comprehension, on the other hand, is recommended, to be practiced at all times, except when sleeping. The expression, to be mindful at all times, it to be understood in this way.

With regard to debugging mind viruses, Bare Attention, concentrates on one object at a time. It is based on the observation, that no two objects can occupy our mind at the same time.
All relations of the object are severed instead of being followed, our judgement suspended, so that the object can be seen as it is.
In the computer analogy, with Bare Attention, we can see all the processes that is currently running in the computer.
But, how do we know which process is a malignant virus, and which are processes necessary for the functioning of the computer? An expert should be able to distinguish them easily. Some viruses, however, attach themselves to normal running processes, and even more sophisticated viruses use stealth techniques to escape detection. If this sounds complicated enough, the task of debugging mind viruses is even more daunting.
There is no guarantee that anyone can ever achieve total purification of the mind, devoid of any mind viruses.
In ancient times, it is believed that wise ages have been able to achieve such feats. Today we owe them and their disciples for the teachings, and practices they left for future generations.
The world has in the mean time grown much in complexity compared to 2000 years ago. Civilization, life, and with them mind viruses have grown ever more complex. I believe that the chance of achieving purification of the mind, has diminished compared to back then, although the possibility is not equal to nil. Anyway, a 80% purification or even just 40% is still much better than none at all, and we will not know until we practice it. A wise man of today would probably achieve enlightenments several times in his life, but never fully immune from the ever mutating mind viruses.

Returning to the topic of Clear Comprehension, we can see it as complementary to Bare Attention, it picks up where Bare Attention left out. Bare Attention cannot distinguish between harmful and neccesary mind objects, this is where the wisdom of Clear Comprehension comes into play.

According to Insight or Vipassana Meditation (see for example Nyanaponika Thera: The Heart of Buddhist Meditation), Clear Comprehension consists of four comprehensions:
  1. Clear Comprehension of Purpose
  2. Clear Comprehension of Suitability
  3. Clear Comprehension of the Domain (of Meditation)
  4. Clear Comprehension of Reality

The first states that before every action, one should examine whether it would be in accordance with our goals, aims, and ideals. Some actions might cause great regrets afterwards. We cannot simply assume that man will always act rationally, particularly if the man is infested by mind viruses, just as we cannot entrust an infected computer to keep our files uncorrupted!

The second says that suitability depending on the internal and external environments should be considered in acting.
If the first comprehension is rather idealistic, the second is practical, adaptible, and flexible. This sounds almost like optimization problems in operations research: optimize goal under the satisfaction of constraints.

The third comprehension is understanding the specific domain, where our actions apply. When playing football, the domain is of course football. But we must make this domain a meditation object or in other words, in every of our actions in daily life, such as eating, walking, running, reading, talking, driving, playing, we should be mindfull.

The last comprehension is understanding what is real and what is virtual, and what is a delusion. There are innumerous delusions that we encounter, in Buddhism, the mother of all delusions is the self delusion.
In Buddhism, the doctrine of nonself (anatta) is one of the three universal characteristics.
Impermanence is quite easy to accept, all things change, the only permanent thing is change itself.
Incompleteness is not hard to understand when we know Goedel's incompleteness theorem or Heisenberg's uncertainty principle or even the second law of thermodynamics. It also manifests itself in day to day life as various sufferings, sickness and death.
Nonself is however much more difficult to stomach than the other two characteristics. Nonself entails also no soul, and no reincarnation. This is often misunderstood, rebirth and reincarnation are different. The process of rebirth is just one breath after another, there is no identity of any kind being preserved in the transition.
How can we deny a self, when we are dealing with me and you all the time?
It is precisely this, why it is called the great delusion. It took me 50 years to begin to understand this, understand here meaning not just intellectually, but to understand with the heart.
The topic of nonself shall be covered in another place, suffice it to say that the most dangerous mind viruses are related to this delusion.
All sorts of problems arise from comparisons "I am better/worse" and possessions "this is mine", " this is ours", etc.
Mind viruses certainly find self delusion as the most important security hole to get into our minds. Advertisements know how to exploit this very well to sell us their products. Flattery is another trap for the self.

The self delusion also applies to groups of people, it is then called a group self delusion. Groups of closely related people often are infected by the same virus, but only outsiders can be aware of it. It is interesting to observe that sometimes the virus is that binds the group together! Think about hate campaigns, hate Mr X, spreading and exchanging jokes about the stupidity or clumsiness of Mr X via SMS and the internet.

All the above four comprehensions are taught in Insight Meditation. They will be very useful in detecting mind viruses, and also preventing us from getting us new ones. They are anti-viruses that heal and protect.
People from different creeds or from different spiritual communities, may formulate the comprehensions in slightly different ways, but they certainly have their goals, constraints, contemplations and what they consider the most important delusions.
Richard Dawkins, who wrote "The God Delusion" presumably would say that the God delusion is the root of all evil.
We may or may not agree with other people's life principles and world views, to say that ours is the only correct one, would be to fall into the self righteousness, which is again a self delusion.
What A considers a delusion, B may consider as the very foundation of her existence. Practicing meditation is one practical way to find out who is right and who is wrong. Shooting each other is not a recommended way to find out.

It would be interesting to conduct a poll what people think is the greatest delusion of all, but the results would mean no more than a popularity contest.

Clear Comprehension is thus different from Bare Attention. Bare Attention is basically the same for different people because it is value neutral. Clear Comprehension is wisdom, and as such very much dependent on our beliefs.

10/27/06

Debugging Mind Viruses

The idea that our minds are infected by viruses is not new. Here we mean viruses as analog to computer viruses (Technically, we use the term virus as a general term to include also worms, spyware, Trojans and other types of malware), not biological viruses. Richard Brodie wrote a book titled “Viruses of the Mind”, with the subtitle “The New Science of the meme”. Meme is thought to be the unit carrier, whereby viruses spread and proliferate. Brodie wrote: “Mind viruses have already infected governments, educational systems, and inner cities, leading to some of the most pervasive and troublesome problems of society today: youth gangs, the welfare cycle, the deterioration of the public schools, and ever-growing government bureaucracy.” In this posting, the author discusses techniques of debugging such viruses. It starts with slowing down, one pointed concentration, bare attention, and ends with reflection, and effort and practice.

Computer programs, except for the simplest school book examples, always have bugs, i.e. programming errors. That is why we have so many update releases and service packs. Yet the service pack itself introduces new bugs! As software grows more complex, the number of bugs increases exponentially. Software also ages, the longer it has been in use, the more likely it is to be in disharmony with the original specifications and/or with the changing environment it is supposed to handle. Additionally, software is often used in an open environment such as the internet, and the bugs are no longer just programming errors, but malware from infections.

The mind is definitely so much more complex than a computer program, quantitatively and qualitatively. It does not take a lively imagination, to see that mind viruses are so much more abundant, fatal and difficult to debug. There are no anti-viruses, which you can simply buy and use to clean our minds. Debugging our minds is inherently difficult, because we have first of all, to admit that we carry viruses, and be willing to scrutinize our ego, habits and world views. Even when we rationally recognize a virus in our minds, we still need considerable discipline to overcome it. Just think about overeating or quit smoking.

The mind debugging techniques discussed here are derived from age-old methods of liberation and purification of the mind. We will see some parallels as well as differences of these methods with computer debugging.

Basic techniques:

The processes in the mind are intricate and interlinked. Just as in computer debugging, we have to do unit testing before we do integration testing. Make sure that each component is functioning as they should, before considering the component’s interaction with each other. If processes are running parallel, we need to consider one particular process in isolation first. This is the technique of One Pointed-ness: concentrate on a single object. Don’t do multi-tasking. Don’t watch television or read the newspaper while eating, don’t answer the phone while simultaneously signing contracts. In the extreme, one should not sing while bathing. To some, this is contrary to what they normally do. Many also think that without multi-tasking, we are not functioning efficiently. There are two different opinions here, one considers debugging as a sort of cleansing process, after which we can return to our normal daily activities. The other says that we have to strive to do debugging at all times, anywhere. Here we only say that there are debug and normal modes, it is possible and desirable for some to in debug mode all the times.

Concentrating on a single object is hard enough. It may be a fast running process. Therefore slow down, trace each step one by one. We are so accustomed to rushing from place to place, from one object to another, from one activity to another, that we become impatient when things slow down. But many people familiar with stress reduction have come to the same recipe: slow down!

The third technique is Bare Attention, seeing things as they are without trying to do anything. Just noting, not labeling, not making inferences nor judgments. Suspend our thinking, just note what happens, breathing in, breathing out. When we have developed this technique to a certain level, we can discern finer things which we normally miss. Our body sends messages to us all the time, but we practically ignore them until one day we discover that we have a serious illness. Nature talks to us in many forms, but we keep destroying the very foundations of life on earth by pollution, cutting down trees, killing plant and animal species. Bare Attention to our to body, mind and to nature will help us to be aware of the messages they send. If a virus infects our mind, they will somehow manifest themselves, and Bare Attention will be aware of their existence. In theory at least, for there are many hindrances to this process; anger, emotion, desire, illusion, attachments can all make the view muddy and turbulent, and prevent Bare Attention to see through.

Bare Attention can be practiced by sitting in meditation, relaxing, and noting our breaths. Our minds will then wander like a monkey, sounds come from all around, sometimes a mosquito bites us, our body aches or we remember someone who has done us wrong in the past eliciting emotions. In Bare Attention we note everything that comes, without judgment, and return to our breath as soon as possible. When we are angry, note the feeling of anger, when a memory arises, be aware of it, and when we desire to quit the meditation, note it also. After our minds are quieter, we will be able to discern not just the fact that something is, but also its arising and passing away. We let things speak for themselves.

Bare attention can be called radical acceptance of the present moment. It is definitely not possible to practice bare attention while wandering to the past or future, or to dream of other places. It therefore ties together with the principle of Here and Now. Za Choeje Rinpoche, in a guided meditation tape, said: “ Meditation is simply the art of living in the present moment. The purpose of meditation is to remain in a state of calm abiding and to relax into our true nature”.

Not being here and now, means we are lost, living in some virtual reality built from memories, illusions and fantasies. To always abide in here and now is a very powerful weapon against mind viruses. By being here and now, we can keep in close touch with reality.

The techniques mentioned so far, One Pointed-ness, Slowing down, Bare Attention, are all connected with each other and with the principle of Here and Now.

It is important to point out, that during the practice, there are two very different processes going on. One is the concentration on an object such as breath, and the other is the noticing of whatever comes into the mind. The second process is unpredictable and chaotic. In order that the practice be beneficial, the first process must dominate, we must only notice the events interrupting the first process, but we must not follow them, we go back to the first process as soon as our awareness allows. The first process is the anchor without which there will no structuring, and chaos will take over. This theme of chaos and order is quite common in other areas. A good architecture is never a complete chaos. Nor is it just order. The order, symmetry and symmetry breaking, and some chaos confined within the order is what makes the architecture a work of art.Insight Meditation consists of two parts, Bare Attention and Clear Comprehension. Bare Attention must precede Clear Comprehension. However, by itself, Bare Attention is not sufficient to understand and reflect our mind. This is where Clear Comprehension comes in, which will be discussed in a follow-up post.